Wednesday, March 12, 2008

The Incredible Hulk Trailer

The new trailer for the Incredible Hulk is out. The fact that whole franchise is rebooted is good news. It looks like the Hulk gets an actual supervillain instead of his dad and a giant poodle this time.

They can make the comic, the TV show or a combination of both; just don't make anything like the Ang Lee version. Lets hope Hulk has some Wrath of Khan magic for his second big screen outing. Also, there better be a "HULK SMASH" in this movie someplace!

Of course the Incredible Hulk has to be a success because if it isn't then we'll never get a She-Hulk. Shulkie would make for a fantabulous character in the next film… …and then they can do a Fantastic Four crossover... oh the possibilities.



Trailer:


-swinebread

11 comments:

ladybug said...

You're making me stay up past my bedtime...you're in trouble bro!

This looks interesting, and yea, we need a She-Hulk movie!

(right after Hugh Jackman's Wolverine is out ...mmmkay?)

Arkonbey said...

Oh, man! I always thought that Richard Corben's "Banner!" would have made a great Hulk film and it looks like they (sort of) are! Woo Hoo!

Ladybug: right on!

Randal Graves said...

Ironman might not suck, and this might not suck. I'm not sure what to make of this new trend!

Doctor Smoke said...

I liked the Ang lee version.

the special effects in this version look as bad as the Mr.Hyde ones in The League of Extraordinary gentlemen.

I'm afraid I won't be going to see this movie...

Dr. Zaius said...

His head is too small in the clip. Out of proportion. Even then, it can't beany worse than Ang Lee's version. You've been tagged. (Sorry. Blame Randal.)

Doctor Smoke said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Dean Wormer said...

I'm gonna sue Marvel for stealing my body as a model for the Hulk.

Not to metion my skin color.

I'm very popular this time of year. Although everybody is always after me lucky charms.

Swinebread said...

LB – Yeah, it’s your standard action/superhero movie. That’s all I want.

Well it does have Gambit so I’m not as excited for wolverine

Arkonbey – Good observation! Maybe another reason it has a chance.

Randal – We’ll settle for OK, how far have we fallen?

Dr S – Well, I’m not gonna, defend the effects as they certainly aren’t anything special. But I have to disagree with you big time on Ang’s Hulk. Simply put it was disrespectful to the character and terrible movie. Why? Because Ang made it into some overcomplicated melodrama about child abuse and not the superhero-monster movie that should have been. Like I said, the Hulk fought his dad and a giant poodle. Not the stuff of an epic movie. Plus, the Hulk had no personally, granted it’s a child-like personality, but Ang’s Hulk was only about Bruce.

Sorry, if I sound harsh, I was particularly angry and dispirited with the first Hulk film.

Dr. Zaius – Yeah Hulk need a bigger head, like in the comics. They’d have to really work at it by this point to get it to be as bad as Ang’s Hulk.

Dean – Well we can sue ‘em together as they used my body for Bruce Banner…

Doctor Smoke said...

No biggy, SB. I get passionate about movies two.
For weeks I would've punched anyone who said Spider-man 3 was good in the face...
until of course I decided to see it as a comedy flick.
then it was fine.
I can't stay mad at Sam... we do share the same birthday after all...

Pandabonium said...

Never got the TV show Hulk with Bill Bixby as Banner. Bixby was a good actor (and person), but that show was pretty lame IMO partly because the situations in which the Hulk take form are not terribly important. More personal problems than superhero work.

Swinebread said...

Dr. S – gotcha

Panda – Well no money for budget was why it really wasn’t a superhero show imo